Resources
We publish research, tools, and lessons learned to help healthcare and legal organizations build and operate medical-legal partnerships and to help funders and policymakers advance medical-legal partnership activities. You can search those resources in the library below.
The library also links to journal articles, authored both by National Center for Medical-Legal Partnership staff and MLP practitioners and researchers from the field, that highlight ways medical-legal partnerships have improved patient health and well-being, the healthcare workforce, and healthcare delivery. A list of these articles with summaries are also available on the Peer-Reviewed Research page.
The Impact of a Pediatric Medical-Legal Partnership on Pediatric Providers: A Qualitative Study
Authors conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 pediatric providers and 20 parents/guardians who had engaged with medical-legal partnership services at an academic medical center in New Haven, Connecticut. They found that the MLP improved provider knowledge of and ability to address social determinants of health and health-harming legal needs, improved provider-family relationships, and encouraged providers to engage in systemic and institutional advocacy. Findings were published in Academic Pediatrics.
Reductions In Hospitalizations Among Children Referred To A Primary Care–Based Medical-Legal Partnership
A study conducted in Greater Cincinnati, Ohio, between 2012 and 2017 examined the effect of referral to a medical-legal partnership on hospitalization rates among urban, low-income children. Researchers found that the median predicted hospitalization rate for children in the year after referral was 37.9 percent lower if children received the legal intervention than if they did not. The research was published in Health Affairs.
Reducing Asthma Exacerbations in Vulnerable Children Through a Medical–Legal Partnership
The study examines whether a medical-legal partnership (MLP) could impact asthma exacerbation rates in a vulnerable urban population at an academic children’s hospital. In a pediatric population with asthma, an MLP intervention was associated with a significant reduction in asthma exacerbation encounters and hospitalizations comparing the year before and after MLP intervention. The findings were published in the Journal of Asthma.
Teaching the Social Determinants of Health through Medical-Legal Partnerships: A Systematic Review
The authors conducted a systematic review to better define the impact that educational programs centered on medical-legal partnerships have on trainees’ knowledge, attitudes and future practice with regards to the social determinants of health. Benefits to trainees were wide in scope but all programs showed improvements in participants’ understanding, comfort, confidence, and/or abilities in identifying and intervening on the social determinants of health in their patients. This article was published in the BMC Medical Education.
Medical-Legal Partnerships Benefit Families of Developmentally Disabled Children
This study assessed the benefits provided by the Health Law Partnership (HeLP), a medical-legal partnership (MLP) in Atlanta, Georgia, to pediatric patients with neuro-developmental disabilities and their families. Over two and half years, legal services led patient families to obtain/retain benefits exceeding $4.9 million in total value. State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) and other health-related assistance resolved cases resulted in an average benefit value of $18,925 per case, followed by SSI and education cases with an average benefit value of $9,585 and $5,336, respectively. Findings were published in The International Journal of Health, Wellness, and Society.
An Interprofessional Approach to Teaching Advocacy Skills: Lessons from an Academic Medical–Legal Partnership
From 2016 - 2017, a medical-legal partnership in Washington, D.C. piloted a legislative advocacy training program for preclinical medical students designed to prepare them to meet with Capitol Hill representatives about a health justice issue. The pilot assessed the impact of adding an interprofessional education dimension to the program, which in this case involved engaging law faculty and students to help the medical students understand and navigate the federal legislative process and prepare for their meetings. Results from the pilot suggest that adding law and policy experts to advocacy-focused training programs can improve medical students’ advocacy knowledge and skills and increase their professional identity as advocates. The findings were published in the Journal of Legal Medicine.
