Resources
We publish research, tools, and lessons learned to help healthcare and legal organizations build and operate medical-legal partnerships and to help funders and policymakers advance medical-legal partnership activities. You can search those resources in the library below.
The library also links to journal articles, authored both by National Center for Medical-Legal Partnership staff and MLP practitioners and researchers from the field, that highlight ways medical-legal partnerships have improved patient health and well-being, the healthcare workforce, and healthcare delivery. A list of these articles with summaries are also available on the Peer-Reviewed Research page.
Integrating Legal Aid into HIV Care: Evaluating the Impact of a Medical-Legal Partnership on Viral Suppression Outcomes
This article published in AIDS and Behavior examined the impact of MLP services for housing, employment, and public benefits on the adherence to medical treatment and viral load suppressions of people with HIV compared to treatment-as-usual. 202 people with HIV in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, were part of the study. At 3-month follow-up, MLP participants were significantly more likely to achieve viral suppression.
Making the Case for Medical-Legal Partnerships: A Review of the Evidence
The National Center for Medical-Legal Partnership has published three comprehensive literature reviews that offer an in-depth analysis of peer-reviewed research on medical-legal partnerships (MLPs). They capture the evolution and growing impact of MLPs across healthcare systems from 1977 - 2024.
Health, Housing, and Justice: Two-Year Implementation Evaluation of a Health System's Multi-State Medical-Legal Partnership to Address Housing Instability
A two-year evaluation of Kaiser Permanenteβs (KP) multi-state medical-legal partnership sheds light on how healthcare and legal sectors can work together to address housing instability and what it takes to implement these partnerships effectively at scale. The findings, published in Health Services Research, reveal that the MLP expanded access to legal services and delivered services efficiently. Eighty-two percent of legal cases were resolved with fewer than five hours of attorney time.
Addressing Unmet Social Needs and Social Risks β A Qualitative Interview-Based Assessment of Parent Reported Outcomes and Impact from a Medical-Legal Partnership
This article published in the Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics reports outcomes from one medical-legal partnership from the perspective of patient-clients. Patients who received legal services had improvements in physical health, including asthma control, and mental health benefits, such as reduced anxiety. MLP involvement also reduced caregiver stress, enabling parents to focus on their childβs health.
Designing and Developing a Medical-Legal Partnership to Address Cancer Patients' Health-Harming Legal Needs
The Georgetown University's Cancer Legal Assistance and Well-being Project launched in 2020 as a medical-legal partnership that works with health care providers at a Washington, D.C. safety-net hospital to treat the health-harming legal needs of historically and intentionally marginalized patients with cancer. Preliminary data support the estimate that the project has secured over $700,000 for patients in the form of insurance coverage, disability benefits and other income supports, paid leave, and debt relief. The findings were published in the Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved.
A Data-Driven Approach to Optimizing Medical-Legal Partnership Performance and Joint Advocacy
In this paper, authors discuss ways in which use of data and quality improvement methods at a Cincinnati-based medical-legal partnership (MLP) have facilitated advocacy at both the individual and population levels as healthcare and legal teams collectively pursue better, more equitable outcomes. The MLP team saw a 38 percent reduction in hospitalizations among children referred to the MLP and were able to recover $1.36M in public benefits for patient-families. The MLP was also able to make system-level upgrades to housing (e.g., pest control, new roofs, and ventilation improvements) affecting 700 families after identifying patterns through data sharing and legal advocacy. And MLP partners streamlined SNAP enrollment processes at the county and state levels, driven by advocacy based on observed patterns of delayed benefit access. The findings were published in the The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics.
