Professional Ethics in Interdisciplinary Collaboratives: Zeal, Paternalism and Mandated Reporting

Login to view the full resource content

May 19, 2009 - 10:30 am

ABSTRACT:

In this Article, the authors, two clinical law teachers and a social worker teaching in the clinic, wrestle with some persistent questions that arise in cross professional, interdisciplinary law practice. In the past decade much writing has praised the benefits of interdisciplinary legal practice, but many sympathetic skeptics have worried about the ethical implications of lawyers working with nonlawyers, such as social workers and mental health professionals. Those worries include the difference in advocacy stances between lawyers and other helping professionals, and the mandated reporting requirements that apply to helping professionals but usually not to lawyers. This Article addresses those concerns in a direct way, using social work as an exemplar for many kinds of interdisciplinary practices.
CITATION:
Professional Ethics in Interdisciplinary Collaboratives: Zeal, Paternalism and Mandated Reporting.   Clinical Law Review.  Spring 2007; 13: 659.   Alexis Anderson, Lynn Barenberg, Paul R. Tremblay.